ACTION NOW

In the garden of an asylium for lunatics there was a fool searching for something among a bed of roses. Another fool came across and asked: " have you lost something" ?
The first fool said: "yes, I lost my watch". 
The second fool started to seach with him. After an hour he looked at the first fool and asked. "are you sure you lost your watch here" ?
The first fool replied: "Oh no, of course not.
I lost my watch in the loo, but it smells much better here, don't you agree ?" 

This story reminds me of our endeavor against Global Warming. The IPCC warned us that we must bring back our CO2 emissions to 50% of what they were during the year 1990 and this before 2020 if we are to remain within the 2 degrees. Yet, we do everything else but our CO2 emissions keep growing year after year. It is very good if we develop alternative energies but what is the use of it if our CO2 emissions continue growing year after year ? Our priority is to drastically reduce our CO2 emissions NOW, not in a decade,  
NOW !

 Is it so difficult to understand ?




नमस्ते 
planetCare 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

Image
The IPCC warned us in its latest report, that we should bring back our CO2 emissions to 50% of what they were in the year 1990 and this before 2020, if we want to keep our planet within the 2° degrees. And the IPCC bases this prevision on the most optimistic scenario. Indeed, during the last decades, the scientists forcasts about Global Warming have been constantly revised upwards. The cascading effet is pretty uncertain and, for instance, we don't know the exact impact of CH4 emissions through the warming of the oceans and the melting of the permafrost. Lima Conference on Climate ends with ridiculous and criminal decisions about CO2 reduction: Reducing CO2 emissions from 40% by 2050 is just nonsense. You can no more haggle over with Global Warming that, for instance, you can haggle over with a fire that transforms your house in a furnace. You cannot say to the blaze: "stop, wait 20 minutes until the firemen arrive". The United States found $ 3000 billion just for I
Read more

What can you do to save the planet Earth?

Image
What can you do to save the planet Earth? You might have had this question popping up in your mind – “What can I do alone to save the environment?” Actually, there are thousands of people like you who have the similar thought in mind, amidst that dilemma and hesitation, no one’s taking a step. But you, alone, have the power to initiate, and those thousands will eventually follow you. No step is a small step, and every contribution matters in its own way. While caring for the planet isn’t a matter to be saved for June 5, however, it’s a good time to start today and take the pledge to do whatever you can, in order to achieve a sustainable environmental development. Organize a cleaning drive: That’s something you can easily do! You have organized parties before, this time, organize a cleaning drive. Call your friends, friends of friends, office colleagues, acquaintances and family members to be a part of this act. Gather in your neighbourhood or a popular market area and clea
Read more

DIRECTLY CAPTURING CO2 FROM THE ATMOSPHERE

Image
Direct air capture is the process of chemically scrubbing carbon dioxide directly from the ambient air, and then storing it either underground or in long-lived products. This new technology is similar to the carbon capture and storage technology used to capture emissions from sources like power plants and industrial facilities. The difference is that direct air capture removes excess carbon directly from the atmosphere, instead of capturing it at the source.  It is relatively straightforward to measure and account for the climate benefits of direct air capture, and its potential scale of deployment is enormous. But the technology remains costly and energy-intensive. It is often difficult to pin down costs for new direct air capture technologies, but a 2018 study estimates that it would cost about $94-$232 per metric ton. Earlier estimates were higher.  Direct air capture also requires substantial heat and power inputs: scrubbing 1 gigaton of carbon dioxide from the air could require ne
Read more